Why is manipulation often considered easier to treat than dependency/codependency?

Manipulation is often considered easier to treat than dependency or codependency for several reasons closely tied to the nature of interpersonal dynamics. When manipulation occurs, there is typically a clear recognition that one party is exerting control or influence over another, which is often met with resistance or discomfort. This recognition can foster an environment where the person being manipulated is more likely to seek change and assert their needs, leading to more straightforward therapeutic interventions.

Additionally, manipulation does not inherently involve the deep emotional entanglements and psychological complexities often associated with dependency or codependency. Dependency and codependency typically involve significant emotional investment and attachment, which can complicate treatment as these scenarios frequently involve patterns of self-sacrifice and neglect of personal needs, making it harder for individuals to identify and remove themselves from harmful cycles.

Overall, the straightforward recognition of being manipulated can provide a clearer pathway to treatment options, as opposed to the more intricate emotional dependencies that require more extensive therapeutic work to disentangle.